KNIFELABAUTODESK FUSION / OPEN COURSEMACHINE ROOM / MODEL REVIEWWritten course ↗Workbench ↗
REFERENCE / PHYSICAL REALISMREVIEWED 1 NOV 2026

PUBLISHED DIMENSIONS. EXPLICIT MODELS.

A knife model should
explain a real knife.

Manufacturer examples anchor the proportions. The calculators answer specific geometric questions. A detailed 3D view makes the construction easier to inspect, while physical fit and cutting behavior still require measurements and trials.

01

Compare the right dimensions.

These published examples establish scale and construction differences. They are references, not product recommendations or source shapes for the original Knife Lab model. Blade length, sharpened-edge length and overall knife length are different measurements.

Manufacturer examplePublished referenceWhat the comparison teaches
Knife Lab original studyExplore the 3D model ↗225 mm overall
110 mm axial blade span
3.2 mm heel stock
Flat primary + 20°/side secondary
The default is a coherent original study within these examples' size range. Local stock tapers to 0.6 mm at 90% of the blade span, then closes to a point. These original taper and grind dimensions are not measurements of the commercial examples.
Morakniv Garberg Black Blade CManufacturer specifications ↗229 mm overall
109 mm blade
3.2 mm stock
Scandi / full tang
The maker lists a total primary grind angle of 26–28° and a separate edge-angle field of 37–39°. A primary bevel and the final edge need separate definitions.
Morakniv Companion SManufacturer specifications ↗219 mm overall
104 mm blade
2.5 mm stock
Scandi / standard tang
Similar external size does not imply the same tang construction. This model uses a molded grip rather than a full-tang pair of scales. Listed total primary angle is 22–24°.
ESEE-4Manufacturer specifications ↗9.0 in overall / 228.6 mm
4.5 in blade / 114.3 mm
4.1 in edge / 104.14 mm
.188 in stock / ≈4.78 mm
The cutting edge is shorter than the stated blade length. ESEE describes the blade as full flat/V ground and separately describes its hand-applied sharpening angle as approximately 20° per side. Grind description · Edge-angle FAQ
Spyderco Bow RiverManufacturer description ↗Full-flat blade
Trailing-point profile
Contoured G-10 scales
Full-tang construction
A useful construction reference for an intentionally shaped handle. We use this description qualitatively; no unverified grind height, hidden hardware dimensions or retailer-derived section is attributed to it.
REFERENCE ≠ REVERSE ENGINEERING

The Knife Lab teaching geometry is original. It is not a digitized Garberg, Companion, ESEE-4 or Bow River. Published stock thickness and length do not reveal a manufacturer's local taper curve, bevel height, edge radius or complete surface.

Grind shape and grind extent are different.

Flat, hollow and convex describe section shape. Full-flat and saber also describe how far the primary bevel extends toward the spine. A hollow may occupy all or part of the blade depth. A zero-ground ideal has no separate secondary bevel; a real product's specification must take precedence over assuming an ideal form from its familiar name. Spyderco's manufacturer glossary

A section angle is not a sharpening prescription.

For a symmetric straight section, shoulder thickness t, total land e and height h determine the primary angle. A 3 mm shoulder, 0.3 mm land and 20 mm height give approximately 3.86° per side. The final sharpening bevel is a separate construction.

α = atan((t − e) / (2h))

Detailed manufacturer comparison and the blade / handle design system ↗

FORM

Change the outline. Keep the construction explicit.

The designer includes original blade and handle libraries, with independent grind controls. General-purpose, traditional, field, kitchen, fish and butchery families can be combined with the handle library. Thumbnails, custom editor, 3D blade and exported outlines share geometry definitions. Open the full designer ↗

Names describe outline families.

Sheepsfoot and Wharncliffe have different nose shapes. Recurve describes the cutting-edge outline, independently of an S cross section. Spear-point has only the lower edge sharpened. American tanto identifies the angular modern study. Case blade types · Spyderco shapes · Shun kitchen shapes

Yanagiba-, deba-, usuba- and kiridashi-inspired entries retain this model's symmetric double bevel. The bread study is explicitly unserrated. Kukri, bolo and parang entries are scaled outline studies; they do not establish chopping capability. Spelling variants and grind names are not counted as extra silhouettes.

Handle style is separate from tang construction.

The grip families have independent side depth, across-palm thickness, neck, rise and rear drop. Six construction choices determine the parts: exposed scales, blind inserted grip, molded enclosure, hollow metal shell, through tang or stacked grip. Octagonal, hexagonal, oval and D sections are circumferentially shaped. The movable grip-section panel cuts the actual meshes, including cavities. Front and rear fitting lengths occupy the entered grip-assembly length. These remain original families with schematic retention and unverified hand fit. Yoshihiro terminology · Shun D-handle explanation

Coke-bottle and coffin shapes are established families; the study curves are original. RoseCraft example · Spyderco coffin-shaped Chokwe

BUILD

Six working constructions, six different assemblies.

These are original adjustable mechanisms. Manufacturer references explain why the families differ; they do not supply the model's internal dimensions. Use the eight construction comparisons to inspect outlines, real mesh sections and matching 3D studies.

ConstructionWhat is modeledWhat to keep separate
Exposed scalesFull-width steel tang, paired shaped scales, shaft bores, larger flat head seats and selected fasteners.Original Corby-style geometry has no functional threads or supplier fit specification.
Blind inserted gripNarrow tapered stem, front-open blind cavity, enclosing grip and optional separate ferrule.A blind stem does not reach a rear washer. Adhesive and retention remain unspecified.
Molded enclosurePolymer enclosure around a selected full or partial core, with actual internal interfaces.Molded material does not imply a tang extent. Garberg and Companion publish different tang types.
Metal shellHollow metal grip with inner and outer surfaces, modeled wall thickness and a core interface.Generic walls and connections are choices; commercial welds and balance fill are not reconstructed.
Through tangNarrow core reaching the butt, through cavity, front fitting and separate rear retainer.Nut-like or peened-style retention is schematic. Threads, deformation and tightening are not simulated.
Stacked gripIndividually closed washers with core openings, a through stem, guard and rear fitting.Count, shape and nut-like retention are original choices. KA-BAR documents a pressed, cross-pinned production pommel. Compression, leather behavior and a locked physical joint are not solved.

Traditional handed single-bevel blades and urasuki backs remain outside the blade model. Deba-, yanagiba-, usuba- and kiridashi-inspired entries still use its symmetric double-bevel section. Broader handle coverage does not change those blade assumptions.

ANATOMY

The tang belongs to the construction.

A full-width plate between scales, a narrow wa insert and an end-retained bar are different steel shapes. Their root, length, section and fitting seat should be designed together. The original Knife Lab families illustrate these relationships; a familiar handle exterior does not reveal a commercial knife’s hidden core.

A cooking heel is not a ricasso.

The cooking studies carry their ground cutting section to the heel. They omit the unground ricasso and blade-side plunge used in some field studies. A narrower neck can still sit behind and above the exposed heel. This is a deliberate teaching choice; real production knives may use bolsters and other heel treatments.

Hock’s actual handleless chef blanks and Takahashikusu’s forging and handle-fitting photographs let you inspect the heel, neck and tang as separate features. Neither supplies the complete dimensions for reproducing those parts.

Read the root, seat and end.

The root meets the blade; the neck establishes the grip position; a shoulder or front fitting provides a defined seating relationship. A blind insert ends inside the grip. A through tang reaches a rear fitting. Side-view depth and face-to-face thickness are separate dimensions, so a visible taper in one view cannot establish both.

Morakniv’s Classic No.3 blank is explicitly a full rat-tail tang. Its No.2000 blank is explicitly a ¾ tang. These bare parts are stronger internal-shape evidence than a finished grip photograph.

AUTO is a rule. Custom is a target.

For blind inserts, partial molded cores and shell mounting stems, length, side-view entry width and finished-end taper ratio can be set independently. AUTO follows the selected family; a custom setting requests a dimension within the model’s available space. The actual result can change to keep the tang and cavity inside the grip. Compare the actual readouts after an adjustment.

Tang length starts at the grip-entry plane and ends at the steel tip; the exposed neck is separate. Entry width means side-view depth, not face-to-face stock thickness. “End width / entry width” requests the finished-end depth divided by the entry depth, including the rounded ending: 100% requests equal depths, while 50% requests half the entry depth at the final face. Local grip and retention constraints can limit the request; the actual ratio is reported separately.

Some dimensions stay connected.

A full tang follows its scale outline, so grip size and contour are its tang controls. Through and stacked stems must reach the rear fitting; a molded full core must reach its exposed tab. Their length stays linked to those parts. Entry width and taper can still be constrained by the local grip corridor and the selected ending.

Move the grip-section station from front to rear to inspect the actual steel and cavity. A section beyond a blind tang’s end should show no steel. Saved design JSON retains AUTO or custom settings; the comparison records actual dimensions as well as the requested mode. These are editable geometric studies, not prescribed tang sizes or joint-strength calculations.

RETENTION IS SPECIFIC

A.G. Russell’s Morseth cutaway documents an end nut. Helle Viking documents a narrow through tang with a diamond-shaped end washer. KA-BAR’s manufacturing account documents compressed leather washers and a pinned butt cap. These are distinct mechanisms; the model’s original schematic fittings do not reproduce every one.

Exact proprietary molded anchors, welded connections, commercial tang tapers and production fits remain unknown unless a source exposes or specifies them. Review the exposed-blade sources and their limits ↗

FILES

Design once. Export the same geometry.

Movable hardware and custom blades.

For the exposed-scale construction, one to five Corby-style stations and an optional lanyard hole can move in the layout. Their centers drive the tang bores, scale seats and fasteners in 3D. Enclosing-grip constructions use their own core, cavity and fittings instead of scale bores and Corby bolts. The model corrects unsupported or overlapping scale-hardware placements. These constraints preserve the rendering model; they are not structural approval, supplier fits or remaining-material specifications.

The custom tool uses 3–16 ordered stations with separate spine and edge heights. The heel stays connected. Linear segments preserve corners; smooth transitions remain within the station envelope. A square nose retains finite depth. This simple side-profile editor does not create arbitrary loops or complete manufacturing surfaces.

Physical units and intentional layers.

SVG uses matching physical millimetres and viewBox units. DXF uses closed polylines, true circles and millimetre unit metadata. Optional scale or grip side references are placed separately; counterbores have their own layer. CUT_PROFILE identifies the actual steel blank, including its selected tang. Enclosing-grip constructions keep grip and fitting references separate from that steel. A two-dimensional reference does not specify a three-dimensional cavity, wall, thread or production fit. Curves are exported as sampled polylines matching the model outline stations, not native CAD splines.

Print preview supports A4 and Letter landscape pages, with 10 mm overlap when tiled. Print at 100% / Actual size, disable Fit to page and browser headers/footers, and measure both axes of the 25 mm square. No kerf, heat-treatment, grinding or finishing allowance is added. Confirm dimensions and import units before making a blank.

KEEP AN EDITABLE COPY

The draft is stored in this browser. Save design JSON for a portable record of custom stations, dimensions, handle and hardware. SVG and DXF are 2D outlines; they do not contain the editable 3D assembly, CAM toolpaths or verified machining instructions.

02

Make the handle construction visible.

In the exposed-scale family, a Corby fastener is a screw-together assembly with a smaller central shaft and larger heads. Its scale seats and tang hole do different jobs. The rounded outside of a scale should retain a flat mating face against the tang.

CORBY STATION / CONSTRUCTION LOGICSCHEMATIC SECTION — NOT TO SCALE
Stepped fastener and handle scale sectionTwo handle scales lie on either side of a steel tang. Larger fastener heads rest in flat-bottom counterbores in the scales. A smaller shaft passes through the tang, with a simplified central threaded connection.HEAD IN A FLAT-BOTTOM SEATSMALLER SHAFT / TANG HOLESECOND MATING HALFSHAPED SCALE / FLAT INNER FACESTEEL TANGOPPOSITE SCALE
Thread engagement is simplified. This drawing explains part relationships; it does not specify lengths, fits, torque or a manufactured joint.

Use the selected supplier's dimensions.

Jantz's 1/4 in head Corby example requires a tang hole of at least 3/16 in and uses a 6-40 thread. Another supplier lists a 1/4 in head with a .180 in shaft. Those values belong to specific products; the word Corby is not a complete hardware drawing. Jantz · Maker Material Supply

Check what remains after shaping.

A head seat needs an appropriate shoulder and remaining scale material. Outer rounding should not accidentally expose its wall. A lanyard tube is annular, with a bore through it; it is distinct from a solid pin or Corby shaft. A palm swell should change the actual outside sections, not merely apply a bevel or texture to a slab.

Supplier examples pair a head-sized counterbore with a smaller pilot. Counterbore example

03

What each instrument can tell you.

The review covers the workbench tools and the added edge-section and board-contact studies. Their arithmetic is useful within the stated models. A more detailed 3D scene does not silently turn the simpler calculators into measured knife simulations.

InstrumentValid interpretationPhysical question still open
Bevel angle lab01 / STRAIGHT SECTIONExact relationship for a symmetric, straight primary bevel. The included angle is twice the per-side angle.A sharpening angle, local tapered section or hollow/convex surface needs its own definition. Magnification changes the drawing, not the numbers.
Grinds & envelope02 / SCHEMATIC FAMILIESCompares adjustable mathematical sections and a rigid running-maximum slit envelope.The polynomial hollow is not wheel-derived. A gap behind an S-shaped bulge does not predict food release, force, friction, cracking or adhesion.
Hollow-grind wheel03 / CIRCULAR ARCExact circular sagitta between an arc and its chord.Not wheel placement, belt compliance, final stock thickness or a machine process.
Distal taper04 / LONGITUDINAL THICKNESSThickness at a station and mean spine thickness for the selected curve.A real taper need not be linear. This plot does not define the complete blade, volume or stiffness. Tip-station thickness is not the final point closure.
Folder motion05 / NOMINAL ROTATIONRigid two-dimensional motion and margins in a simplified closed rectangular envelope.No lock, stop, spring, detent, hardware stack or 3D interference. Closed-state margins are not all-angle clearance checks.
Mass & balance06 / ASSEMBLED MESH PROPERTIESSigned closed-mesh volumes and part centroids, combined with assigned densities in all six construction families. Modeled bevels, bores, cavities and separate fittings are included.Density defaults and wood conversion are estimates. Unmodeled glue, threads, welds, ballast and finish are omitted. Exploded display positions do not change the assembled result. Method and wood-density basis ↓
Pin layout07 / RECTANGULAR TANGPitch and geometric material between circular holes and rectangle edges.A nonnegative ligament is not a strength criterion. Plain holes do not represent Corby seats or tube walls.
Fit & tolerance08 / WORST-CASE ARITHMETICTotal clearance across stated extreme dimensional limits.Not a statistical probability or per-side clearance. Flatness, burrs, coatings and pivot preload remain outside the model.
Paper template12 / PHYSICAL-SIZE FILEAn original practice outline in physical millimeters, with a calibration square.Print scale needs checking in both axes. The width input shapes a curve; it is not guaranteed maximum width. Paper cannot establish rounded handle comfort.
Chip load & feed10 / FEED PER TOOTHSpeed × flutes × programmed feed per tooth, plus reverse arithmetic.Actual chip thickness also depends on engagement. Tool guidance, radial chip thinning, runout and machine behavior are not solved.
Ball-nose scallop11 / IDEAL CUSPExact circular cusp geometry for a flat plane normal to a perfect spherical cutter.Not measured roughness on a sloping surface, a worn tool or real material.
Flip & registration09 / COORDINATE REFLECTIONHow an asymmetric part and reference points change in the illustrated opposite-face view.Not controller WCS, pin fit or a mechanically validated fixture.
Sheet layout13 / ENVELOPE GRIDRectangular envelopes, margins, spacing and one selected grain orientation.Not true-shape nesting, actual blade-area yield, hold-down clearance or a supplier-approved layout.
Batch cost14 / EXPLICIT ASSUMPTIONSSetup, machine, good-part finishing, material and extra-start costs without double counting.Assumed scrap is an average, not guaranteed output. This model rejects before finishing; later defects need a stage-specific estimate.
Edge thickness by height15 / PIECEWISE TRANSVERSE SECTIONThickness above a mathematical apex through a straight secondary bevel and primary face, capped at stock thickness.Symmetric flat geometry; no edge radius, hollow, convex or single-bevel section. The width-enlarged detail does not show true angles or predict cutting behavior.
Board contact & grip clearance16 / SAMPLED RIGID CONTACTRotates an original builder outline and lowers its sampled edge to the first board touch; reports grip/fitting, heel and tip heights.Sampled 2D geometry at the chosen angle, not a hand/knuckle envelope or a rocking-motion, flex, food or force simulation.
04

Checks on the implemented 3D model.

The viewer uses separate closed meshes appropriate to the selected construction. A blade and tang share the heel interface. Exposed-scale assemblies add two scales, two halves per fastener and an optional open lanyard tube. Other families add an enclosing grip or shell, front and rear fittings, and individual stack washers where selected. The section panel cuts those actual meshes. Geometry tests check finite coordinates, closed edges, positive volume and modeled openings; they do not establish production fits. Camera orbit and the exploded view expose the assembly.

LOCAL GEOMETRY / CONSISTENT DIMENSIONS

The primary height runs from the behind-edge junction to the primary shoulder. The secondary height follows the entered per-side angle. Local heights and behind-edge thickness reduce as the tapered blade narrows. Outside the blended plunge, hollow sections lie on circular arcs with one global effective radius; the model increases an incompatible requested radius to preserve monotonic thickness, and reports the effective diameter. Convex and S relief remain illustrative section families. The S family includes an actual recess behind its lower bulge.

The blade and tang are separate closed rendering meshes that meet at the heel and represent one steel component. Fastener threads, final fitting, microscopic edge radius, belt compliance, heat treatment and cutting behavior are outside this visual model. Material textures illustrate appearance. Bevel angles refer to transverse sections at a constant longitudinal station. On curved or angled cutting edges, the angle in a plane perpendicular to the local edge can differ; this is not a constant edge-normal sharpening model. Profile names identify broad outline families; they do not assign a steel, grind, edge count or physical use rating. Shun's kitchen-shape guide and ESEE's Nessmuk-style JG5 description distinguish those names from separate construction specifications.

  1. Actual three-dimensional surfaces. Camera orbit must reveal modeled bevels, taper and scale contours. Lighting alone cannot create missing geometry.
  2. A continuous local blade section. Shoulder thickness, land and bevel height must remain compatible with the narrowing outline. A fixed land cannot become thicker than the local tapered stock; the point needs deliberate closure.
  3. Separate taper and primary grind. Inspect along the spine for longitudinal thickness change, and across a section for flat, hollow, convex or compound shape. Define the plunge and unground region deliberately.
  4. Construction-specific interfaces. Scales retain flat tang contacts and head-seat shoulders. Enclosing grips retain a cavity around the core; shells need inner and outer surfaces; separate stack washers need through openings. Inspect front and rear fittings as parts of the assembly.
  5. Hardware that belongs to the assembly. Scale construction shows mating fastener halves, smaller shafts, larger seats and an optional annular tube. Through and stacked grips show rear retention instead. Nut-like and peened-style shapes illustrate choices; they do not model functional threads, deformation or verified engagement.
  6. Geometry checks at control extremes. Look for crossed surfaces, inverted local thickness, exposed head pockets and nonfinite vertices. A closed mesh still does not establish a manufactured fit or cutting result.
WHAT HAS AND HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED

The existing tools and course use computed relationships and original educational geometry. No Knife Lab knife has been physically made, measured or cutting-tested as part of this resource. A modeled clearance, smooth shaded surface or animation is not evidence of actual comfort, retention, joint strength or food release.

How this connects to the written course

The course separates photo calibration from complete measurement, primary grinds from sharpening, and nominal fit from physical evidence. It asks for named interfaces, staged allowances, fixture references, first-article measurements and revision records. Use the detailed model to see those relationships, then record what a real prototype actually demonstrates. Open the inspection module ↗

MASS

Mass and balance from the assembled parts.

The live mass-and-balance tool uses the original 3D assembly, rather than equivalent rectangles. It integrates the oriented triangle surface of each closed part to obtain its volume and centroid. Modeled bevels, holes, hollow shells and internal grip cavities therefore affect the estimate. For each part, mass in grams equals volume in mm³ × assigned density in kg/m³ × 0.000001. The assembly center is the mass-weighted mean of the part centroids. Curved surfaces are approximated by finite triangles, and each component uses uniform density. These are properties of that triangle model. The component material regions are assumed disjoint: shared interface caps add zero volume, while positive overlap would be counted twice. The calculation sums parts; it does not perform a Boolean union.

Coordinates refer to the assembled knife: x = 0 is the blade heel/plunge, negative x points toward the tip, and positive x points toward the grip. The blade and tang meet at the heel and represent one steel component. Other components occupy their modeled material volumes; a cavity contains no grip material. Exploding, rotating or clipping the display does not relocate the reported assembled center of mass. Its x projection is a balance coordinate, not a prediction of hand comfort, cutting behavior or an ideal balance point.

CATALOG BASIS / A BLANK IS NOT A SPECIES MEAN

The pinned Global Wood Density Database v2.2 file contributes 17,260 taxon entries, including 16,591 species-ranked entries and additional infraspecific or unresolved names. The catalog retains modeled basic-density means: oven-dry mass divided by green or saturated volume. They are not measured densities of individual air-dry handle blanks. Coverage is the complete valid pinned species-aggregate file, not every world species, trade name, burl or stabilized product. Common-name search aids do not merge distinct taxa or their density values.

The service-density calculation follows USDA Wood Handbook (2021), Chapter 4, equations 4–12 to 4–14. Let Gᵦ be basic density divided by 1000 kg/m³ and M the entered moisture percentage. The model uses Gₘ = Gᵦ / [1 − 0.265(1 − M/30)Gᵦ], then ρₘ = 1000Gₘ(1 + M/100) kg/m³, for 0–30% moisture. The 30% fiber-saturation point and shrinkage relationship are approximate assumptions, not measurements of the selected piece. The default 12% result is labeled an estimated service density and keeps the raw basic value separate.

Use the custom density override for measured stock, especially stabilized or resin-filled burl. Measure mass and volume in the same material condition; do not apply an untreated-wood moisture correction to a composite. Species, growth conditions, moisture, voids and added resin can change the actual blank. Review the steel, grip, fittings, hardware and spacer density assignments independently. A black ferrule, wood-like texture or metal sheen does not identify a material grade.

Material / model assumptionPublished comparison and limit
Generic steel: 7850 kg/m³A modeling assumption. BÖHLER N690 lists 7700 kg/m³; Uddeholm Arne/O1 lists 7800 kg/m³ at 20°C. A metal shell may use another alloy.
Brass: 8500 kg/m³Copper Development Association C36000 gives relative density 8.5. This supports a representative brass assumption, not every alloy or purchased fastener.
G10: 1850; Micarta and assumed dark phenolic fittings/spacers: 1350 kg/m³Illustrative defaults, not named-grade measurements. Dark fittings and spacers use an explicit phenolic assumption, not a density inferred from black color. Norplex-Micarta lists typical relative densities of 1.77 for NP500A glass/epoxy and 1.37 for NP310 canvas/phenolic. Reinforcement, resin and stock grade matter.
Polymer: 1150 kg/m³An assumed enclosing-grip material. Ensinger grade data illustrate the variation: polypropylene about 910, cast PA6 about 1150, and POM-C about 1410 kg/m³. No proprietary molded knife grip is reconstructed.
Leather: 1000 kg/m³; unspecified fallback: 1000 kg/m³Explicit placeholders to replace with measured or grade-specific values. Leather apparent density depends on tanning, moisture and compaction. “Synthetic horn” also does not specify one resin or density; identify the material or enter its measured value.

Unmodeled adhesive, functional threads, weld deposits, ballast, surface coatings and finishing losses are absent. The calculation does not discover overlaps or reconstruct missing commercial internals. Physical mass and balance should be measured on a prototype and compared with the stated assumptions; disagreement is evidence to investigate, not a reason to change density without explanation.

Wood data attribution: Fischer FJ et al. (2026), Global Wood Density Database v.2, v2.2 (with metadata), Zenodo version DOI, associated paper, licensed CC BY 4.0. Knife Lab extracts the published model means, converts g/cm³ to kg/m³ and applies the separately disclosed service-moisture estimate. The raw density basis and source identifiers are retained.

REF

Primary references